| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Tallest wrote: Greetings Please post your feedback about capital ship balancing in this thread. Thanks. Your Tallest. Update (10/11/11) : Based on feedback, the following changes will be made in addition to the previously proposed chang...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2011.11.13 17:03:00
|
2. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Here are my thoughts: -- capital weapons need a nerf to tracking so that titans are still effective vs slow/webbed/tped/stopped subcapitals, but not the instapop everything monsters they are now. -- IF capital weapons get a nerf to tracking, the ...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2011.11.04 19:26:00
|
3. the new buddy list - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I dont know if there has been a topic made about this or not, and to be honest i really dont care. In regards to the new buddy list, i am quite annoyed at it in its entirety. All of my folders are gone, and every one of the giant multitude of ch...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2010.05.29 16:55:00
|
4. Size of Sov upgrade modules and hubs. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I can understand the idea of 0.0 being a rough and tough place and i fully support ideas that contribute to that kind of exciting and challenging play, however, i find it odd that the infrastructure hub module and almost all of the upgrade modules...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2009.12.02 15:46:00
|
5. CCP: time to take a look at minmatar? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
i wouldn't ask for any attention from ccp in regard to a race's qualities. Look what happened to caldari when we asked for boosts.... they nerfed missiles, and are looking at nerfing ecm now too... En Taro Adun!
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2009.04.01 03:57:00
|
6. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Is there a plan to allow them to use the covert ops cloaking device. It has been argued that due to the price of the ships, and their limited role offensively, as well as their vulnerability defensively, they should be allowed that feature. Pers...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2009.03.31 17:39:00
|
7. Login stops at "Entering Station". - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
when logging into a station you need to uncheck the dustfield option in the area with the premium graphics settings.
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2009.02.14 08:02:00
|
8. Sigularity Mirror - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sudden Outcry Wow, we certainly haven't been asking this same question for the last month. Thank you for your constructive and not at all redundant contribution to the forum. LOL As if berating someone with sarcasm was a...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2009.01.04 18:19:00
|
9. [constructive ideas] Titans and the DDD - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I actually like the concept of the doomsday device, however, the detriments of using one are pitiful, making their use more of a mindless reflex rather than a thought out tactical response to a scenerio. If the doomsday device made a titan incapa...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2009.01.04 09:54:00
|
10. ECM system needs an overhaul - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
perhaps one of those 2 campers needs to be in a falcon En Taro Adun!
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.10.16 04:58:00
|
11. Nano Nerf ??? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: lebrata The patch as was killed speed tanking utterly and without exception, hacs became expensive wastes of space and anything smaller was also not worth flying. Battle cruisers especially caldari battle cruisers and battl...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.10.06 15:55:00
|
12. A better speed rebalance feedback thread... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kepakh My as brick slow harbinger can hit and force to run interceptor orbiting me at +20km doing 8km/s. You want them to go even slower? So no, fast ships, even the smallest ships meant to go fast, are not invulnerable.......
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.23 22:03:00
|
13. A Small Update on the Speed Changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It figures that a nano nerf would go hand in hand with the idea of a missile nerf or some kind of change in the mechanics that would probably cause more problems than already exist. As if smartbombs nano and the idea of uber defender missiles wasn...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.23 20:48:00
|
14. A better speed rebalance feedback thread... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kepakh Is there any particular reason why people still keep hammering on speed being nerfed? :) Because it has been promised, and hasn't happened yet after several months? Its not even on sisi anymore... what happened? ...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.23 18:33:00
|
15. A Thought for Black Ops Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think the problem with giving the black ops bships the same gank n tank stats of the tech 1 counterparts is that it defeats the purpose the devs had in mind. It seems based on the descriptions of the ships that the devs wanted us to use our imag...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.11 16:25:00
|
16. A Thought for Black Ops Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@ murder one -- you will have to forgive me i made a typo in my post about the redeemer stats, the 20% is meant to be neut transfer ammount and the 15% is the range. @ Laechyd Eldgorn -- I have been flying my widow around in 0.0 as well for the ...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.10 16:37:00
|
17. A Thought for Black Ops Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@ Hugh Ruka: -- Recon and intel isn't necessarily about 100% stealth or 100% fast killing damage. the point of my ideas is to turn these ships into half battleship - half recon cruisers. With the jump portal and the "half battleship" part is to gi...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.10 14:21:00
|
18. A Thought for Black Ops Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
hmm curious comments considering that the current recon ships have been fairly successful. i dont suppose you have any better ideas? En Taro Adun!
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.10 06:16:00
|
19. A Thought for Black Ops Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There have been many complaints about the Black Ops battleships especially here on this forum area. There have been many random ideas thrown around, as well as some pretty good ones as well. The simple truth is, this ship class is not just "underp...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.09 23:17:00
|
20. A Thought for Black Ops Battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Specific ship bonuses: Redeemer: [8 High)(4 Medium)(7 Low] -- Battleship Skill Bonuses: -- -- 10% to drone hp and damage per level -- -- 20% to energy campire and energy neutralizer transfer range per level -- Black ops Skill Bonuses: -- -- 15% t...
- by Fenix Zealot - at 2008.09.09 23:17:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |